metaforiX Incorporated
Sitemap Search Site
HomeHome
About UsAbout Us
Metaforix ServicesMetaforix Services
Partners and FriendsPartners and Friends
Our Favorite SitesOur Favorite Sites
Bookworms, Wordsmiths, and TrendwatchersBookworms, Wordsmiths, and Trendwatchers
ArchivesArchives
Subscribe to our FREE e-letterSubscribe to our FREE e-letter
More Information about our free e-letter

Archives
Main   |   Metaforix Mail   |   Lois on the Web   |   Informaticons

For previous issues, please click here.


METAFORIX MAIL


Volume 1, Issue 20 December 12, 2000
CONTENTS AT A GLANCE:

ON MY MIND: My Fake Facts
IN THE MEDIA: Child Labor?
INFORMATICON:Hyping Hype
Cyberspeak: "Urban Legend"
SITE OF THE DAY: Secrets of Aging
GUEST COLUMNISTS WANTED!


ON MY MIND
[From the Editor]

Et Tu, New Yorker?

Last week, we broke our practice of limiting our regular "In the Media" segment to items that can be located online. We urged you to leave your desk, visit the library, and read Rodney Rothman's New Yorker piece, "My Fake Job." Billed as a factual account, "My Fake Job" chronicles Rothman's stint at a Silicon Alley dotcom where he just showed up one day and started to work -- without ever having been hired.

In keeping with The New Yorker's usual practice, the piece itself didn't appear on line. The same cannot be said, however, for the fallout it engendered. Rothman, it seems, neglected to tell the magazine's editors that his mother had worked at the dotcom in question, and that one or two other details -- like a workplace massage administered by a female co-worker -- were manufactured from whole cloth. Or perhaps I should say virtual cloth.

While you still need to visit a library to read Rothman's original article, you needn't leave cyberspace to read what Slate's Jack Shafer calls "snarling rounds of ack-ack from the journalistic community" aimed at The New Yorker's "squadron of sharp-penciled fact-checkers."

Some journalists find The New Yorker's lapse especially sweet in light of a similar incident two years ago, when the target was not The New Yorker, but The New Republic. Writer Stephen Glass was fired after his editors, tipped off by a Forbes reporter, became aware of Glass's history of playing fast and loose with the truth. Peter Canby, The New Yorker's chief fact checker, took the occasion to gloat over The New Republic's lapse. "We would have smoked it out very quickly," he bragged.

New Yorker editor David Remnick apologized publicly for "My Fake Job" via a note on the letters page of the December 11 issue. And Slate's Shafer offered Canby a choice between a written apology to New Republic editor Martin Peretz and a slice of humble pie.

Now, I'm not a believer in the notion of absolute truth. To my mind, all knowledge is socially constructed. The best we can strive for is not truth, but authenticity. I've been wondering, though, how this entire incident has been colored by The New Yorker's hifalutin absence from the Internet.

Would the magazine have been better off with "My Fake Job" out there for all the world effortlessly to see? Or is it just as well that nonsubscribers and couch potatoes are restricted to summaries, slings, and arrows?

In the unfortunate event that history repeats itself and the magazine commits another uncharacteristic faux pas, we may have the opportunity to find out. It has been reported that The New Yorker will be on the Internet soon, "very soon." Now, that would be the talk of the town.


[Sources for this column: Slate, The Washington Post, Inside.com, and The New Yorker]

Cordially,

Lois C. Ambash, Editor
editor@metaforix.com

 


IN THE MEDIA
[a recent news article, feature, or opinion piece]

Babies in the Workplace

"A Bit of Burping Is Allowed, if It Keeps Parents on the Job," a recent New York Times article announced. A tight labor market, the desire to keep valued employees happy, and the high cost of quality childcare arrangements have led to a new workplace phenomenon: desktop infants.

In a trend that surpasses on-site day care centers and costs a great deal less, to boot, employers are encouraging new parents to keep their babies with them throughout the work day. Certain caveats apply: the infant must generally be under six months old, the parent must arrange for backup coverage from co-workers, and functions like nursing and diaper-changing may be restricted to private spaces.

Some employers report that customers welcome the presence of infants while they are transacting business. And those who have embraced the trend find it easier to allow a temporary loss of productivity than to lose the employee to a protracted parental leave.

While employers usually institute grievance policies to accommodate co-workers who feel inconvenienced or overburdened by infants in the workplace, many are surprised at the small number of complaints they receive.

But you may be sure that organizations such as Child Free Families, featured in an October NPR broadcast on "Equity for Childless Workers," espouse a different point of view. Journalist David Molpus explores the backlash against workers with children on the part of co-workers who feel pressured to pick up the slack. Listen to the broadcast, archived on the NPR site, for a different perspective.


INFORMATICON
[a provocative quote, statistic, or piece of data]

"The Theology of Our Times"
Kevin Kelly, former Executive Editor, Wired

"I think hype gets a bum rap. Hype is the derogatory term for the good practice of imagining what we are creating, because unless we can imagine it we can not find it or make it.

"And the more the idea is rounded out by description and anticipation, the more it is believed and articulated, the more possible it becomes. This is why science fiction is now the theology of our times."


 

Cyberspeak
[the vocabulary of the information age]

Faster than a Speeding Bullet

Most of us are familiar with the term "urban legend," a story that is not true, or not quite true, or no longer true -- but keeps making the rounds and acquiring new believers regardless.

Probably because of the speed of information, the term has now become associated with the Internet. In a two-second search, I found the term in five online dictionaries of computer terms. Here's a typical entry, from ComputerUser.com:

"A story which is not true, or only partially true, but which circulates widely and becomes a part of popular mythology.Many urban legends are propagated on the Internet, and some will go the rounds again and again."

Urban legends may concern computer viruses that don't exist, charitable appeals that ended long ago, get-rich-quick schemes, or tax hikes that no legislator has ever proposed. For an extensive catalog of urban legends and tips on "how to hoax-proof yourself," visit Walt's Navigating the Net Forum.


SITE OF THE DAY
[a nice place to visit]

Aging in the Information Age

This cool multimedia exhibit was produced by a consortium of science museums and health-related organizations. The physical version of the exhibit will travel to several American cities over the next three years -- but for now, check it out online.

The beautifully-designed site contains a number of multimedia activities and games, along with a slew of interviews, articles, links and teaching resources appropriate to people of various ages. My favorite page lets you see twelve-year-olds morph into senior citizens, right before your eyes.

To visit this site, go to:

http://www.secretsofaging.org/index2.html

GUEST COLUMNISTS WANTED!
Metaforix Mail seeks guest columns on how information technologies are (or are not) changing your world of work. Contributions are subject to editing for length and clarity.

If your column is accepted for publication, it will be permanently posted on the Metaforix web site, along with a link to your e-mail address or URL.

As a small token of appreciation, you will also receive a $10 gift certificate toward your next purchase at Amazon.com.

To submit a column for consideration, e-mail it to
editor@metaforix.com.
Talk to you soon, Lois


Please note that the links contained in Metaforix Mail are current as of the time of publication. Some of them may no longer be operative at the time you access past issues.

BACK TO TOP

To Volume 1, Issue 19 December 5, 2000
To Volume 1, Issue 21 December 19, 2000

 

 
Home  | SitemapAbout Us  |  Metaforix Services  |  Partners and Friends  |  Our Favorite Sites
Bookworks, Wordsmiths, & Trendwatchers  |  Archives  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

 

© 2000 Metaforix Incorporated